Cowboy Economics
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to CowboyEconomics.com RSS Feed Subscribe
New Articles
Owning too much company stock puts workers' retirement at risk 6/25/2009

Bankruptcy rates reflect policy, not people 6/24/2009

Economic crisis heightens financial fallout for bereaved 6/23/2009

Study separates russian flat tax myth and fact 6/20/2009

How consumers continue enjoying their favorite experiences 6/19/2009

Rural tourists' profile analyzed 6/18/2009

Extended service contracts: When and why do people buy them? 6/18/2009

The complicated consumer: Positive ads aren't always the most effective 6/17/2009

The nature of economic manias and crashes 6/16/2009

The dark side of gifts: Feeling indebted may drive people to the marketplace 6/16/2009

If you do good, you look good 6/12/2009

Wage gap linked to customer bias 6/6/2009

Over 60 percent of all US bankruptcies attributable to medical problems 6/5/2009

Lack of capital not a 'death sentence' for start-ups 6/4/2009

Design input accelerates new technologies' route to market 6/3/2009

The economics of nice folks (6/20/2008)

Tags:
philanthropy

A basic tenet of economics is that people always behave selfishly, or as the 18th century philosopher economist David Hume put it, "every man ought to be supposed to be a knave."

But what if some people aren't always knaves?

Sam Bowles argues in Science June 20 that economics will get it wrong then, sometimes badly so. He points to new experimental evidence that people do often act against their own personal self-interest in favor of the common good, and they do so in predictable, understandable ways. Poorly-designed economic institutions fail to take advantage of intrinsic moral behavior and often undermine it.

Take this example: Six day care centers imposed a fine on parents who picked their children up late. The effect? Tardiness doubled, and it stayed high even when the fine was removed. Parents, it seems, stopped seeing lateness as an imposition on teachers, and instead saw it as something that could be purchased with no moral failing.

Another example is a study this year which showed that women donated blood less frequently when they were paid for it than when it was an act of charity.

These examples show that economists ignore human altruism at their peril. Standard economic theory assumes that incentives that appeal to self-interest won't affect any natural altruism that may exist, but that assumption is clearly wrong. Bowles discusses the research to date that helps to explain when and why that assumption breaks down.

As the world becomes more interconnected and the resulting challenges to humanity increase, learning to harness these altruistic impulses becomes even more important, Bowles says. So the economists' "holy grail," to learn to design institutions and policies to direct the selfish impulses of individuals to public ends, "will be necessary but insufficient," Bowles says. "The moral nature of humans must also be recognized, cultivated, and empowered."

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the Santa Fe Institute

Prepaid Credit Card

Post Comments:

Search



Archives
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2010 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.